From the American Meteorological Society website:

It is increasingly clear that the development of sound science is necessary but not sufficient to translate into beneficial actions with respect to the weather, water and climate threats and opportunities. There are numerous cases to demonstrate this including:

• Post-disaster surveys following major weather disasters that document decision makers not understanding and reacting to the forecast and warning information received
• Disproportionate impacts in diverse and marginalized communities
• The lack of action commensurate with the threat of climate change impacts
• Flat or reduced funding for key science efforts including sustaining basic observing systems.
• Inadequate engagement with communities to contribute to resilience (e.g., inadequate building standards).

We must expand our engagement of communities in meaningful and respectful ways; we must meet communities of stakeholders where they are versus where we are. Engagement implies a two-way dialog where we enter the conversation equally interested in learning as we are in communicating our ideas.

Communities include the public at large through various structures (e.g., faith-based communities, civic associations, etc.), policy makers in governments at all levels, the emergency management community, and other stakeholders.

We should be focused on how we better serve disadvantaged communities by working with policy makers and non-profit organizations. Social justice should be germane to our actions.

We should be identifying more ways for communities to contribute to our science and services. Examples include citizen science, being ambassadors from various communities (e.g., faith based), etc.